Skip to main content

Updated April 25, 2026

AI Search Visibility Checker

See exactly what ChatGPT, Claude, and Perplexity can — and can't — read on your landing page. 12 specific checks, no signup, instant results.

https://
FreeNo signup~1 minute

How does it work?

30–48% of US Google queries now return an AI Overview, and ChatGPT, Claude, and Perplexity capture an exploding share of conversational search. The visibility game has expanded beyond the SERP — and most pages have no idea whether they're visible to AI engines at all.

The AI Search Visibility Checker runs 12 specific checks against your landing page. We test what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and PerplexityBot can actually parse, what your structured data emits, and whether your content is extractable in the format AI engines expect. The result is a clear pass/fail for each visibility signal — not a vague "GEO score" with no actionable next step.

What gets checked

Three categories of signals, each weighted by impact:

  • Crawler permissions — robots.txt rules for GPTBot, ClaudeBot, PerplexityBot, OAI-SearchBot, Google-Extended, and Amazonbot. A blocked crawler is the most common single cause of invisibility, and it's invisible until you check.
  • Content extractability — server-side rendering of critical content, semantic HTML structure, alt text on images, headline-to-meta consistency. AI engines extract differently than Google's classical crawlers — what was good for SEO isn't automatically good for AEO.
  • Structured signals — JSON-LD validation, presence of FAQ schema, BreadcrumbList, Organization, Product/SoftwareApplication, and (when present) llms.txt. Pages with valid structured data are 3–4x more likely to be cited in AI answers than pages relying on prose alone.

Why this differs from a generic SEO audit

Traditional SEO tools test for Googlebot. AI engines have different parsing strategies, different schema preferences, and entirely different signals (llms.txt, brand mentions on third-party sites, FAQ structure). A page with a perfect Lighthouse score can still be invisible to ChatGPT if its main content loads via client-side JavaScript with no SSR fallback. We test the AI-specific signals other audits skip.

Pair this with our GEO readiness checker for the broader strategic audit, and our DIY AI visibility audit guide for the manual checklist. The gap between AI-visible and AI-invisible pages is widening, not narrowing.

What gets audited

Your hero and copy account for 40% of conversions. Most pages nail neither.

Robots.txt crawler audit

Check rules for GPTBot, ClaudeBot, PerplexityBot, OAI-SearchBot, Google-Extended, Amazonbot.

Server-side render check

Verify your hero, value prop, and CTA are visible to AI crawlers without JavaScript.

Structured data validation

Detect JSON-LD presence, type coverage, and parsing errors for FAQ, Organization, Product schemas.

llms.txt presence

Check for an llms.txt file at the root and validate its structure.

Content extractability

Test whether the page text is parseable, semantic HTML is correct, and alt text is meaningful.

Citation-readiness

Score whether key claims are framed in AI-citable patterns (specific, attributable, structured).

Sample insight

"Your hero loads via client-side JS — invisible to GPTBot."

Your headline and value proposition render after JavaScript executes. GPTBot and PerplexityBot don't run JS by default. Even though humans see your page perfectly, AI engines see an empty <body>. Move the hero content to your initial HTML payload (SSR or static).

Common questions

How is this different from Google's PageSpeed Insights?

PageSpeed measures performance and Core Web Vitals. We test AI-specific signals: AI crawler permissions, structured data preferences specific to AI engines, llms.txt presence, and whether your content is extractable by tools that don't execute JavaScript. Different audit, different problems.

Will allowing AI crawlers hurt my regular SEO?

No. Allowing GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and PerplexityBot has no effect on Googlebot or your traditional search rankings. They're separate crawlers with separate index destinations.

Does this guarantee my page will appear in ChatGPT?

No tool guarantees AI search visibility — that depends on training data, query relevance, and authority signals from third-party mentions. What we can guarantee is that your page is extractable, parseable, and structured. That's necessary but not sufficient.

What's the most common visibility issue you find?

Client-side rendering without SSR fallback. Pages built in React, Vue, or Angular without server-side rendering frequently have empty HTML for AI crawlers. The fix is straightforward but often skipped — frameworks like Next.js, Remix, and Astro handle SSR by default.

Should I add an llms.txt file?

Yes — it's a 10-minute task with measurable upside. llms.txt gives AI engines a clean, structured summary of your site's purpose and key pages. Early adopters report better citation accuracy. The spec is still evolving but the format is stable.

How often should I re-run this audit?

Quarterly minimum, or after any major site change (rebrand, migration, framework switch). AI search guidelines evolve faster than traditional SEO — what's optimal today may shift in 3–6 months.

Related reading

See what’s holding your page back

Free analysis. Specific fixes. About 1 minute.

https://